SF County Jail is in San Bruno, but it's under the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Sheriff's Office and the Board of Supervisors. A few oddities like that in our government that date back many years to when the Peninsula was only lightly developed and SF could just buy land there for not much and claim it as sovereign territory. Not everyone on the the Peninsula loves that these days, but no much you can do about it.

Lots of airports aren't actually in the cities that control them. I believe O'Hare is in fact in Chicago but Midway is not. BWI is not in Baltimore or Washington.

None of which has anything to do with the fact that naming SFO after Harvey Milk is an excellent idea. And I think all those people who say nobody in the Castro knows who he was are utterly wrong. Milk is a queer icon. 

I don't hear you objecting to anything named after US Presidents, any one of whom killed more people than Che.

Your lack of historical knowledge is once again on full display, as it was when you ventured into the Vietnam/Suharto stuff and got totally pwned.

It's fashionable among the right wing to casually throw around terms like "murderer" with regards to Che. The truth is very different. When Che was a guerilla and shortly after the revolution, he either ordered the executions or was in a position to pardon and refused to pardon a number of people -anywhere from a few dozen to a few thousand, depending on who you ask. All of these cases were for things that would often carry the death penalty, particularly in wartime -war crimes, murder, rape, desertion, etc. You can take issue with whether it's just. And I do. I don't think it's right to execute someone for desertion. But shit, even Lincoln and FDR did that. But there doesn't seem to be any evidence that implicates Che for the death of innocent civilians.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091230060828AACW1gh

I don't normally use a source like YahooAnswers, but the first response appears to be very well researched and itself includes 3 links from neutral sources. Of note, also, is the second answer, which seems to contradict the first, parroting the fashionable "Che is a murderer" line. But it's telling that in order to find a "source," they were unable to support their position with anything other than another viciously anti-Cuban right-wing blog post.

By contrast, if you look at the records of virtually ANY US president, each has *murdered* far more people, including many innocent civilians. We murdered 3 million Vietnamese, putting Johnson and Nixon in the same league as Pol Pot. We murdered about a million Iraqis according to a report in the Lancet. Who knows how many excess deaths there have been in Afghanistan -the numbers will probably be shocking once they come out. Even in those little forgotten inconsequential wars, we routinely murder more innocent civilians than all the criminals Che ever executed in his life. Something like 2000 civilians died just in Panama in 1989 to name but one example.

You love to pretend that you're this self-styled "independent thinker," but in reality you're just another right-wing follower parroting the usual garbage.

Your hypocrisy, your ignorance, and your lack of moral compass are once again on full display.

heh.